Running for presidency of the United States is such a tedious rewarding task, only meant for the strong-willed personality.
Years of planning, months of debating and weeks of traveling can genuinely take its toll. However, exceptional candidates, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama continue to maintain their classic American style in an effortless approach that stays true to their individual taste.

Senator Clinton knows that the podium and stage are not the runway. She wears conventional, tailored pant suites that are appropriate for her age and stature. Her ensembles are usually ordinary, however the Senator herself is not. So you may see her in a brown or black suite, except her blouse is always bold in color and her accessories continuously stand out. Her fashion sense is absolutely as smart and as strong willed as she.

While Senator Clinton is traditional, Senator Obama is a bit eccentric in his campaign style. His relaxed approach to fashion is evident as he usually fore-goes the traditional look of suites by extracting his tie from his suites. If he has to attend a formal event a pale blue tie will be worn. With or without a tie Senator Obama maintains a fresh look that speaks to the people, letting them know that while this presidential hopeful appears laid-back he is never off from the task at hand.
So on this Super Tuesday vote for the candidate who's plans, issues and of course fashion sensibilities mean the most to you!




Comments: (10)
Add a comment
By: F1 on 2/05/2008 2:46PM
Hillary Clinton Dishonors The Memory Of Martin Luther King Jr.
http://www.judiciaryreport.com/hillary_clinton_dishonors_MLK.htm
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lavone - New Jersey on 2/05/2008 2:56PM
Yes,I have seen the clip,and if my vote is what stops this madness then I couldn't be more pleased. Thankyou for the information. I see the removed my 1st comment!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Lavone - New Jersey on 2/05/2008 3:02PM
THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION OF EXPERIENCE
You make the call!!
President Clinton took no action after the first World Trade Center attack in 1993. There was proof-positive of a third terrorist with definitive connections to the Middle Eastern Terrorist in the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, (which you can read more about at The North Intelligent Network) that was never fully investigated and hidden by the media.
No action was taken after the 1996 attacks on Kohbar towers in Saudi Arabia, nor the bombing of a U.S. embassy in Peru in 1998. He did respond to the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya by launching air missiles into Sudan and Afghan targets, however the New York Times reported that officials claimed the missiles were not targeted at Bin Laden.
There was also no action taken after the attacks on the U.S.S. Cole in 2000.
This is the Clinton legacy that Senator Clint openly embraces, but wants you to forget:
From The Progressive Review
-The only President ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
-Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates
-Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
-Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
-Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
-First president sued for sexual harassment
-First president accused of rape.
-First lady to come under criminal investigation.
-Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
-First president to establish a legal defense fund
-First president to be held on contempt of court
-Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
-Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
-First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
STARR-RAY INVESTIGATION
-Number of Starr-Ray investigation convictions or guilty pleas (including one governor, one associate attorney general and two Clinton business partners): 14
-Number of Clinton Cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 5
-Number of Reagan Cabinet members who came under criminal investigation: 4
Number of top officials jailed in the Teapot Dome Scandal: 3
CRIME STATS
-Number of individuals and business associates with the Clinton machine who have been convicted of or pleaded guilty to crimes: 47
-Number of these convictions during Clinton’s presidency: 33
-Number of indictments/misdemeanor charges: 61
-Number of congressional witnesses who have pleaded the Fifth Amendment, fled the country to avoid testifying, or (in the case of foreign witnesses) refused to be interviewed: 122
SMALTZ INVESTIGATION
-Guilty pleas and convictions obtained by Donald Smaltz in cases involving charges of bribery and fraud against former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy and associated individuals and businesses: 15
-Acquitted or overturned cases (including Espy): 6
-Fines and penalties assessed: $11.5 million
-Amount Tyson Food paid in fines and court costs: $6 million
CAMPAIGN FINANCE INVESTIGATION
-As of June 2000, the Justice Department listed 25 people and 19 convicted because of the 1996 Clinton-Gore fundraising scandals.
-According to the House Committee on Government Reform in September 2000, 79 House and Senate witnesses asserted the Fifth Amendment in the course of investigation into Gore’s last fundraising campaign.
-James Riady entered a plea agreement to pay an $8.5 million fine for campaign finance crimes. This was a record under campaign finance laws.
CLINTON MACHINE CRIMES FOR WHICH CONVICTIONS WERE OBTAINED
Drug trafficking (3), racketeering, extortion, bribery (4), tax evasion, kickbacks, embezzlement (2), fraud (12), conspiracy (5), fraudulent loans, illegal gifts (1), illegal campaign contributions (5), money laundering (6), perjury, obstruction of justice.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
-Number of independent counsel inquiries since the 1978 law was passed: 19
-Number that have produced indictments: 7
Number that produced more convictions than the Starr investigation: 1
Median length of investigations that led to convictions: 44 months
Length of Starr-Ray investigation: 69 months
Total cost of the Starr investigation (3/00): $52 million
Total cost of the Iran-Contra investigation: $48.5 million
Total cost to taxpayers of the Madison Guarantee failure: $73 million
Bill and Hillary Clinton are revisionists when it comes to history, and they are continuing to rewrite their own legacy.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: truthbeit on 2/05/2008 5:06PM
Why slam the former President now?he handled his Chief of Staff business when he was in office the Country was not in a mess like it is now regardless of his sexual behavior.The American people did get to dream and some were fullfilled by their dreams with jobs and with an economy that did keep this country afloat regardless of the flagships of politics as usual we didn't take on all those policies that is the President's job,as we do now and still have no voice in the outcome.Change now is the inevidible,we need to rethink and give the American People a voice in our lives!!!!Remember the whole world is watching,not just the RACE CARD AND GENDER THAT WE ARE SO0 TIRED OF IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS,WE NEED TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE OF CHANGE IN FOREIGHN RELATIONSHIPS WITH THE COUNTRIES THAT'S IN OUR BEST INTEREST,NOT CHASING HEAR SAY AND POWER,BUT WORKS FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE,IT IS CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD THAT OUR ALLIES HAVE TAKEN US DOWN FROM OUR POWERFUL POSITION BUY THE WORKS OF THIS CURRENT PRESIDENT,AND WE KNOW THAT THE TASK OF REBUILDING AND STRENGTHING OUR COUNTRY AT A STATIS OF RESPECT AND TRUST IS GOING TO TAKE SENSIBLE LEADERSHIP AND NOT FANACTICS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THAT WILL DIG US TOTALLY UNDER THE POWER OF COMMUNISM AS WHERE WE ARE HEADED NOW.THE REGAN ADMINISTRATION RAN BY NANCY,AND THE WORLD AT THE HANDS OF A DEMENTED OLD MAN LET HIS WIFE TAKE HIM INTO THE END OF THE REGAN PRESIDENCY,DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THE DAYS RONALD RELEASED ALL THE PEOPLE THAT HAD MENTAL DISORDERS TO THE STREETS OF CALIFORNIA,AND THAT'S WHEN THE ERA OF HOMELESSNESS BECAME A BIG ISSUE,AND ALL WE HEAR IS HOW GREAT HE WAS THE SKIPPER HAHA!TELL ME WHAT ON EARTH WAS SO GREAT ABOUT THAT Reagan,except that he acted his way into politics and gave the gavel to Nancy for standing in when he couldn't remember anything,but we have airports,libraries and other monuments named in his honor,AMERICA PLEASE !!!!ALL I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THE BUSH'S IS THAT THE OIL GOOGLES HAVE ALWAYS CLOUDED THEIR MINDS ON WHAT 'S REAL AND WE AS AMERICANS WAS JUST NOTED TO GO ALONG WITH THE PATRIOTIC SMBOL OF GOD BLESS AMERICA.AND THAT'S THAT!!
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: SAN on 2/12/2008 3:50PM
OBAMA HAS BROUGHT SO MANY PEOPLE TOGETHER AND THE CLINTON GROUP AND THEIR CAMPAIGN HAS DIVIDED EVERYONE SINCE NEW HAMPSHIRE.
BUT YOU SEE IT ONLY MAKES OTHER CANDIDATES STRONGER. IT WILL SHOW IF SHE WERE TO WIN THE NOMINEE. SHE HAS DIVIDED THE PARTY BY DIRTY POLITICS.
OBAMA IS WHAT IS GOOD IN AMERICA. HE HAS RAN A GREAT CAMPAIGN.
HE HAS BROUGHT SO MANY PEOPLE TOGETHER. I AM PROUD OF HIM.
EDWARDS DID ALSO. IT WAS A SHAME THAT THE CLINTONS RAN THE ROBOCALLS WITH LIES ON THEM ON EDWARDS THE NIGHT BEFORE SOUTH CAROLINA.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Cecil Jones on 2/06/2008 3:26AM
Before I get off subject talking about what the Clintons and Obama have or haven't done to earn the honor of being elected President, I think I should talk about her "style." Hillary dresses age appropriately for a woman with a big butt. Her body is rather shapely for a womaning not aging so gracefully, but I wouldn't want to see her or Obama in swimwear ever again. She looks absolutely hideous in blue and green. Look at the pictures. She looks like she has jaundice. Now what did they do to deserve the honor of being elected? Hillary was a victim of a lying husband and she cried when her career was on the line. What did Obama do? That Negro hasn't stopped running since he hit the Senate.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: anthony on 2/06/2008 5:05AM
i've been looking at obama hillary and obama very carefully. i've researched their pror records, and i must say, obama cries about "change", while in the senate, he hasn't made much change at all. if you compare his senate record, versus hillary, it's clear ro see hillary has been the hardest working candidate of the two. it almost seems to me, that obama was "sleeping on the job". he really hasn't accomplished much at all. so when he talks about "change", well i think he had his time in the senate to make change, but the record shows, he hasn't made much change at all. we need someone who will work for the middle class, someone who will work hard to keep jobs in america, someone who will work to keep people in their homes, someone who will work on healthcare issues, someone will work on our economy. obama only talks about the problems, but i really haven't heard much about what he will do. he talks a good talk, but that's not going to fix the problems. look at their records, it's clear to see, hillary has accomplished much more.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: DarkNLuvly on 2/06/2008 10:39AM
In alot of ways Hillary Clinton is just a female version of President George Bush. Do we really want to continue living in this nightmare again for another 4 years?! I think not.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: India on 2/06/2008 8:16PM
I would definitely vote for Obama if he had a different view on gun control. Read on cnnpolitics issues. I want my concealed handgun permit and the right to bear arms in this day and age. I don't understand his reasoning to abolish our rights on carrying a handgun if we're an outstanding citizen, no arrests etc. Here's the facts.
Hillary Clinton
Voted for a 10-year extension of the assault weapons ban. Voted for requiring extensive background checks at gun shows. Supports licensing and registration of handguns, mandatory trigger locks for handguns, holding adults responsible for their children's use of guns, raising the youth handgun ban from age 18 to 21, limiting gun sales to one per month and allowing the Consumer Products Safety Commission regulate guns.
Obama: Supports extending the assault weapons ban. Supports national law against carrying concealed weapons, with exceptions for retired police and military personnel. Supports limiting gun sales to one per month.
And one per month, I know a lot of gun collectors that can buy two to three a month. Why doesn't he tighten up on the people that sell them to the average Joe on the streets who uses it illegally.
Reply to this Comment | Report This
By: Charles on 4/02/2008 5:26PM
Wyh do the supporters of the Clintons give Hillary and Bill a pass for all the wrongs that Bill committed during his presidential term? It is like they are blind sheep being led by a sheep posing as a wolf. Both Parties are liberal with the Democrats becoming socialists. They want to expand the government and force the taxpayer to support their wastefull and failing government programs while tying the hands of our men and women who serve in law enforcement and the 5 branches of the military with their regulations. These people are nothing more than cons and they are sellouts to the New World Order. The media, which is controlled by the government, is becoming the voice for our enemies over seas and are in it for the Democrats hands down. It is like we are living in Russia and the stupid population over here does not get it. It is like they have been dumbed down by the liars that are ruling the Democrat party like Hugo Chavez is ruling his country with an iron fist. This election is NOT about what is best for the American people it is about who and what party will get the biggest slice of cheese. Americans better wake up and start paying attention because their freedoms are in jepordy.
Reply to this Comment | Report This